03-03-2017, 03:26 AM
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
03-03-2017, 04:56 PM
(03-01-2017, 11:40 PM)sadaf188 Wrote: [ -> ]Sunil sir....the solution I have figured out of ques 16 is y=x^3....nd it satisfies all d conditions.
Nd if y is constant i.e., y=1, then there is no point of giving y=f(x)
This is wat I thought.
hi,
Are u planning to challenge this question? Even i approached this question in this same method.
03-03-2017, 05:58 PM
No....I m not challenging this one....becoz my teacher told me...how d answer is one.
03-03-2017, 06:13 PM
Did anyone started challenging, if yes than post the question which is challenged , so others cannot challenge on the same question.
03-03-2017, 06:28 PM
(03-03-2017, 06:13 PM)kashyap.aluru Wrote: [ -> ]Did anyone started challenging, if yes than post the question which is challenged , so others cannot challenge on the same question.Not yet started but I will challenge ques 49
03-03-2017, 11:40 PM
has anyone challenged pedigree, question
03-04-2017, 03:56 AM
(03-03-2017, 11:40 PM)ajanthpraveen Wrote: [ -> ]has anyone challenged pedigree, questionNot me
03-04-2017, 04:22 AM
(03-02-2017, 05:15 PM)masthanbasha Wrote: [ -> ](03-02-2017, 02:49 PM)RahulK Wrote: [ -> ]For the Pedigree question:
I found the below images from book :
Genetics : A conceptual Approach by Benjamin A Pierce
Image 1: Shows the standard symbols used in pedigree chart
Image 2: Shows a pedigree chart which is somewhat similar to the gate question pedigree chart
Besides that
I went through a video on NPTEL course "Human Molecular Genetics" which is on pedigree analysis at this link :
http://nptel.ac.in/courses/102104052/5
Between minute 32 and 33 of the video professor says that the carriers in "x linked recessive condition" are denoted by a "dot within the circle".
We can challenge the question giving the reason that no clear indication is given if any of the females in the given pedigree are carriers thus X linked recessive condition was not indicative from the given pedigree.
I think these should make a strong case for review of Pedigree question and hold in favour of us because it is in the NPTEL cource lecture as well as a standard book.
the google image of y linked inheritence as same as given question and u r explanation also perfect and the three questions are very meanful for challenge
The given pedigree analysis can’t be x linked recessive due to following reasons-
- X linked recessive is passed from mother to son and never from father to son. (1)
- For the given pedigree to be x linked recessive the mother in first progeny has to be carrier but in that case they should have 1 carrier daughter, 1 healthy son, 1 affected daughter, and 1 affected son which is not the case.(2)
- For all the affected males the disease is being passed on to the son and for that to happen all the females , even ones who married the affected sons (marked as 6 and 9 in the attached file) have to be carrier. Chances for that are very low.
- The given pedigree is a classic case of Y linked inheritance for the disease Hairy ears and Retinitis pigmentosa(3)
References
03-04-2017, 05:02 AM
(03-04-2017, 04:22 AM)rizviaijaz08 Wrote: [ -> ](03-02-2017, 05:15 PM)masthanbasha Wrote: [ -> ]the google image of y linked inheritence as same as given question and u r explanation also perfect and the three questions are very meanful for challenge
The given pedigree analysis can’t be x linked recessive due to following reasons-
- X linked recessive is passed from mother to son and never from father to son. (1)
- For the given pedigree to be x linked recessive the mother in first progeny has to be carrier but in that case they should have 1 carrier daughter, 1 healthy son, 1 affected daughter, and 1 affected son which is not the case.(2)
- For all the affected males the disease is being passed on to the son and for that to happen all the females , even ones who married the affected sons (marked as 6 and 9 in the attached file) have to be carrier. Chances for that are very low.
- The given pedigree is a classic case of Y linked inheritance for the disease Hairy ears and Retinitis pigmentosa(3)
References
aijaz n rahul u guys are challenging the pedigree question
03-04-2017, 05:04 AM
(03-04-2017, 04:22 AM)rizviaijaz08 Wrote: [ -> ](03-02-2017, 05:15 PM)masthanbasha Wrote: [ -> ]the google image of y linked inheritence as same as given question and u r explanation also perfect and the three questions are very meanful for challenge
The given pedigree analysis can’t be x linked recessive due to following reasons-
- X linked recessive is passed from mother to son and never from father to son. (1)
- For the given pedigree to be x linked recessive the mother in first progeny has to be carrier but in that case they should have 1 carrier daughter, 1 healthy son, 1 affected daughter, and 1 affected son which is not the case.(2)
- For all the affected males the disease is being passed on to the son and for that to happen all the females , even ones who married the affected sons (marked as 6 and 9 in the attached file) have to be carrier. Chances for that are very low.
- The given pedigree is a classic case of Y linked inheritance for the disease Hairy ears and Retinitis pigmentosa(3)
References
and the cytokinesis inhibition one was the cplchicine correct answer for it